Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Artificial Intelligence and National Security ; : 47-67, 2022.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-20244862

ABSTRACT

In the modern age, the context of health, energy, environment, climate crisis, and global Covid-19 pandemic, managing Big Data demands via Sustainable Development Goals and disease mitigation supported by Artificial Intelligence, present significant challenges for a given territory or national boundaries' policies, legal systems, energy infrastructure, societal cohesion, internal and external national security. We look at policy, technical, and legal applications alongside ramifications of relevant policies and practices to highlight key challenges from a global and societal context. This review contributes to developing further awareness of the complexity and demands on policy and technology. In the long term due to these significant changes, inferences of multifaceted policy and data acquisition could present additional compounding challenges regarding civil liberties, data privacy law, and equitable health outcomes, whilst implementing continually evolving policies, practices, and techniques that can weaken infrastructure and present cyber-attack vulnerabilities. As a consequence of local, regional, and international paradigm shifts, Blockchain and Smart Contracts are suggested as part of a solution in providing data protection, transparency, and validity with transactional data to enable further trust between private and public sectors during times of crisis and technological transition processes. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.

2.
British Journal of Diabetes ; 21(2):222-227, 2021.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1579705

ABSTRACT

Background: People with diabetes and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have a significantly greater risk of death and/or intensive care unit (KU) admission. The Association of British Clinical Diabetologists (ABCD) recently audited out- comes for people hospitalised in the UK with diabetes and COVID-19. Methods: The ABCD COVID-19 and diabetes audit was a retrospective audit of patients admitted to UK hospitals with diabetes and COVID-19 between March and December 2020. Data related to patients admitted in Wales were compared with patients admitted in England and Scotland. Results: In Wales, 40/82 (48.7%) patients with diabetes had COVID-19-related mortality compared with 1,149/2,916 (39.1%) in the UK group (p=0.08). The Welsh cohort were more likely to be Caucasian, have a higher body mass index and HbA1c, be diagnosed with diabetic retinopathy and prescribed a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor or insulin than those in England and Scotland. Patients admitted to the ICU in Wales were more likely to be male and have type 2 diabetes. Conclusions: Patients admitted to hospital with diabetes and COVID-19 in Wales had a poorer outcome compared with England and Scotland. This disparity may reflect social inequality, differences in cardiovascular risk factors and/or differences in diabetes medications between hospitalised patients in Wales and the UK.

3.
Diabet Med ; 38(1): e14433, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-873253

ABSTRACT

The emergence of continuous glucose monitoring has driven improvements in glycaemic control and quality of life for people with diabetes. Recent changes in access to continuous glucose monitoring systems within UK health services have increased the number of people able to benefit from these technologies. The COVID-19 pandemic has created an opportunity for diabetes healthcare professionals to use continuous glucose monitoring technology to remotely deliver diabetes services to support people with diabetes. This opportunity can be maximized with improved application and interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring-generated data. Amongst the diverse measures of glycaemic control, time in range is considered to be of high value in routine clinical care because it is actionable and is visibly responsive to changes in diabetes management. Importantly, it is also been linked to the risk of developing complications associated with diabetes and can be understood by people with diabetes and healthcare professionals alike. The 2019 International Consensus on Time in Range has established a series of target glucose ranges and recommendations for time spent within these ranges that is consistent with optimal glycaemic control. The recommendations cover people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, with separate targets indicated for elderly people or those at higher risk from hypoglycaemia, as well as for women with type 1 diabetes during pregnancy. The aim of this best practice guide was to clarify the intent and purpose of these international consensus recommendations and to provide practical insights into their implementation in UK diabetes care.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Health Personnel , Practice Guidelines as Topic , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/methods , COVID-19/prevention & control , Comorbidity , Consensus , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Diabetes Complications/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus/blood , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Health Personnel/education , Health Plan Implementation/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Time Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiology
5.
Diabet Med ; 37(7): 1087-1089, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-183183

ABSTRACT

The UK National Diabetes Inpatient COVID Response Group was formed at the end of March 2020 to support the provision of diabetes inpatient care during the COVID pandemic. It was formed in response to two emerging needs. First to ensure that basic diabetes services are secured and maintained at a time when there was a call for re-deployment to support the need for general medical expertise across secondary care services. The second was to provide simple safe diabetes guidelines for use by specialists and non-specialists treating inpatients with or suspected of COVID-19 infection. To date the group, comprising UK-based specialists in diabetes, pharmacy and psychology, have produced two sets of guidelines which will be continually revised as new evidence emerges. It is supported by Diabetes UK, the Association of British Clinical Diabetologists and NHS England.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Hospitalization , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Disease Management , Humans , Pandemics , Patient Readmission , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2 , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL